"

I. Mindful Navigation of Power Dynamics

By being aware of and mindfully navigating power dynamics, library staff can actively work to dismantle systems of oppression, including racism and ableism, within the library. This includes acknowledging and challenging privilege, amplifying marginalized voices, and creating spaces where all patrons feel valued and respected regardless of race or ability. Library staff hold positions of authority within the library setting, which can influence interactions with patrons. Being mindful of power dynamics means recognizing and addressing any imbalances in authority that may exist between staff and patrons. By acknowledging these dynamics, staff can strive to create a more equitable and respectful environment where patrons feel empowered rather than marginalized even further. There are inherent power imbalances between library staff and patrons. By being mindful of these dynamics, staff can ensure that interactions with patrons are respectful, equitable, and empowering. It involves recognizing and addressing how institutional structures and societal norms may impact patrons’ experiences in the library, especially those who have experienced trauma, allowing for more compassionate and inclusive service provision.[1][2][3]

Mindful navigation of power dynamics is integral to fostering antiracist and antiableist practices in the library as it helps librarians recognize and address systemic inequalities and biases embedded within the institution.

  1. Recognizing Structural Inequities: By being mindful of power dynamics, librarians can identify and understand how structural inequities based on race, gender, ability, and other intersecting identities shape library interactions and services. This awareness allows librarians to challenge and dismantle discriminatory practices within the institution.
  2. Promoting Equity and Inclusion: Mindful navigation of power dynamics enables librarians to create more inclusive and equitable spaces within the library. By actively working to mitigate power differentials and centering the voices of marginalized individuals, librarians can ensure that library services and resources are accessible to all patrons, regardless of their background or identity.
  3. Empowering Marginalized Voices: Librarians who are mindful of power dynamics are better equipped to amplify the voices and experiences of marginalized communities. They can actively seek out and highlight resources that represent diverse perspectives and identities, thereby challenging dominant narratives and promoting a more inclusive library environment.
  4. Building Trust and Collaboration: Mindful navigation of power dynamics fosters trust and collaboration between librarians and patrons, particularly those from marginalized backgrounds. When patrons feel that their identities and experiences are respected and valued within the library, they are more likely to engage with library services and resources. This, in turn, contributes to the development of a more vibrant and inclusive library community.

Mindful Navigation of Power Dynamics is closely related to each of the six principles of trauma-informed care:

  1. Safety: Mindful navigation of power dynamics contributes to safety by ensuring that power imbalances within the library environment are recognized and addressed. Library staff who are aware of their authority and privilege can create a safer space by being mindful of how their actions and decisions may impact patrons. This awareness helps prevent potential harm and ensures that patrons feel physically and emotionally safe within the library.
  2. Trustworthiness & transparency: By navigating power dynamics mindfully, staff demonstrate trustworthiness and transparency in their interactions with patrons. Transparency about the library’s policies, procedures, and decision-making processes fosters trust among patrons. Staff who are transparent about their roles and responsibilities build credibility and reliability, enhancing the overall trustworthiness of the library as a supportive environment.
  3. Peer support: Mindful navigation of power dynamics promotes peer support by encouraging collaboration and shared decision-making among library staff. Library staff who are mindful of power dynamics recognize the importance of supporting and empowering their colleagues. By fostering a culture of mutual respect and support, staff create an environment where staff feel valued and supported in their roles, leading to enhanced peer support within the library community.
  4. Collaboration & mutuality: Mindful navigation of power dynamics emphasizes collaboration and mutuality in relationships between staff and patrons. Library staff who are mindful of power dynamics seek to collaborate with patrons as equal partners in the library experience. This collaborative approach promotes mutual respect and understanding, leading to more meaningful interactions and relationships between staff and patrons.
  5. Empowerment, voice, & choice: Mindful navigation of power dynamics empowers patrons by respecting their autonomy and agency within the library setting. Library staff who are mindful of power dynamics recognize the importance of offering patrons choices and opportunities for self-determination. This empowerment enhances patrons’ sense of control and ownership over their library experience, leading to greater satisfaction and engagement.
  6. Cultural, historical, & gender issues: Mindful navigation of power dynamics acknowledges the intersectionality of cultural, historical, and gender issues within the library environment. Library staff who are mindful of power dynamics recognize that these factors can influence patrons’ experiences and perspectives. By being sensitive to cultural norms, historical context, and gender dynamics, staff can create a more inclusive and equitable library environment that respects the diversity of patrons’ backgrounds and identities.

Mindful navigation of power dynamics is essential in libraries because it ensures that interactions between librarians and patrons are conducted in a fair, equitable, and respectful manner. Libraries, like any institution, are not immune to power imbalances, which can manifest in various ways such as differences in authority, privilege, or social status. By being mindful of these dynamics, librarians can actively work to mitigate the effects of power differentials and create more inclusive and empowering environments for all patrons. Mindful navigation of power dynamics also helps librarians recognize and address systemic inequalities within library spaces. This includes acknowledging the ways in which certain groups may be marginalized or disadvantaged based on factors such as race, gender, class, or ability, to name a few. By being aware of these dynamics, librarians can strive to counteract them through policies, practices, and programming that promote equity and social justice. Mindful navigation of power dynamics also fosters trust and collaboration between librarians and patrons. When patrons feel that their voices are heard and respected, they are more likely to engage with library resources and services. This, in turn, contributes to a more vibrant and inclusive library community where all individuals feel valued and empowered. Overall, mindful navigation of power dynamics is essential in libraries to ensure that interactions are conducted ethically, respectfully, and in a manner that promotes equity and social justice for all patrons.

Mindful Navigation of Power Dynamics refers to the deliberate and conscious approach to understand, acknowledge, and address the various power structures and imbalances that exist within library settings. It involves cultivating an awareness of the ways in which power operates within interpersonal relationships, organizational structures, and societal contexts, and actively working to navigate these dynamics in a manner that promotes equity, inclusion, and respect for all individuals. This approach entails recognizing one’s own privilege and biases, as well as the systemic forces that shape power relations, and taking proactive steps to mitigate the potential for harm or marginalization. Mindful navigation of power dynamics requires ongoing self-reflection, critical inquiry, and responsiveness to the needs and perspectives of diverse community members, with the goal of fostering a library environment that is empowering, affirming, and accessible to all.

Challenging Whiteness: Creating Inclusive Library Spaces in Trauma-Informed Practice

In the context of trauma-informed librarianship, being mindful of power dynamics within the library setting is paramount to creating an environment that promotes healing and empowerment. Libraries, as institutions, inherently hold power by providing access to information and resources. It’s crucial for library staff to recognize and critically examine these power dynamics, understanding how they can influence interactions with patrons and amongst colleagues, particularly those who hold marginalized identities. By acknowledging the inherent power imbalances and actively working to mitigate them, library staff can cultivate relationships built on trust, respect, and collaboration. This involves fostering a culture of transparency, accountability, and inclusivity, where patrons are empowered to voice their needs and preferences without fear of judgment or discrimination. By centering the experiences and agency of library users, we can strive to create a more equitable and trauma-sensitive library environment.[4][5][6][7][8]

Historically, libraries have been spaces that, despite their intentions of inclusivity, have often excluded certain groups of people.[9] The concept of library spaces being inherently “white” is explored by scholars like Sara Ahmed in her work “Whiteness of Spaces.”[10] Ahmed delves into how physical spaces are imbued with whiteness through their design, decor, and cultural norms, creating an environment that can feel unwelcoming or even hostile to those who do not fit into the dominant white culture. This can lead to feelings of discomfort, alienation, and marginalization among individuals who do not see themselves reflected in these spaces or who feel their identities are not valued. In the context of trauma-informed librarianship, it’s essential to recognize and address these historical and systemic barriers to access and inclusion. Library staff must actively work to dismantle whiteness within library spaces, fostering environments that are truly welcoming and affirming for all individuals, regardless of race, ethnicity, or background. This includes reimagining library policies, practices, and programming to center the needs and experiences of marginalized communities, creating spaces where everyone feels a sense of belonging and safety.[11][12][13][14]

Exercise 1: The Social Identity Wheel

The Social Identity Wheel worksheet serves as a tool for you to explore and reflect on your social identities, considering how these identities may vary in visibility or significance depending on the context. You are prompted to identify various social identities, such as race, gender, ability, and sexual orientation, and categorize them based on their personal perception and how others perceive them.

Activity Objectives:

  1. Encourage critical reflection on personal identities and their significance in different social contexts, such as the classroom or university environment, to address barriers to inclusion.
  2. Highlight how privilege operates to normalize certain identities over others, fostering awareness of language, for instance, as a privileged aspect of identity.
  3. Promote sensitivity to both shared and diverse identities among students, fostering a sense of community and empathy within the classroom.

Here is the link to the worksheet and instructions. 

Here are in depth facilitator instructions.

Embracing Cultural Humility in Trauma-Informed Practice[15]

What is cultural humility?

Cultural humility transcends the confines of mere cultural competence, emphasizing an ongoing journey of self-reflection, openness, and humility in interactions with individuals from diverse cultures. It involves acknowledging the limitations of one’s own understanding, challenging implicit biases, and embracing a posture of lifelong learning and curiosity about others’ experiences and perspectives.

What’s the difference between Cultural Competence and Cultural Humility?

While cultural competence focuses on acquiring knowledge about different cultures and applying it in practice, cultural humility centers on introspection, humility, and genuine engagement with individuals. Unlike cultural competence, which may foster a sense of expertise or mastery, cultural humility encourages humility and recognizes the inherent complexity and diversity within cultures.

Why is cultural humility important to trauma- informed practices?

Cultural humility is paramount in trauma-informed practices within library settings as it lays the foundation for building trust, validating diverse experiences, and creating safe and inclusive spaces for all patrons. By cultivating cultural humility, library professionals can navigate power dynamics, dismantle systemic barriers, and foster authentic connections with patrons, thereby enhancing the effectiveness and impact of trauma-informed care.

Integrating cultural humility into library practices involves adopting a mindset of openness, reflection, and continuous learning to authentically engage with patrons from diverse cultural backgrounds. By embracing cultural humility as a guiding principle, libraries can create welcoming and inclusive spaces where all patrons feel respected, valued, and empowered to engage with library resources and services.

Exercise 2: Personal Identity Wheel

The Personal Identity Wheel is an activity worksheet designed to prompt you to explore aspects of your identity beyond social categories. You are encouraged to list adjectives describing yourself, your skills, favorite books, hobbies, and more. Unlike the Social Identity Wheel, this worksheet does not focus on perception or context. If you are using this as a facilitator in a training, it can be utilized as an icebreaker or paired with the Social Identity Wheel to foster reflection on the connections and disparities between personal and social identities. Facilitators can use the wheels to initiate group discussions or reflective writing sessions on identity using the Spectrum Activity, Questions of Identity.

Activity Objectives:

  1. As an icebreaker, the activity helps students establish common ground and foster a sense of community by learning more about their peers.
  2. When paired with the Social Identity Wheel, the Personal Identity Wheel encourages students to examine how their personal identities intersect with or diverge from their social identities.

Here is the link to the worksheet.

Here are in depth facilitator instructions.

Trauma informed librarianship in praxis

Critical reflective practices

“Reflective Practice and Critical Reflection” by Jan Fook[16] delves into the imperative need for these processes within professional spheres, especially amidst contemporary challenges to traditional professional authority and the rise of objective accountability measures. It can be understood as part of the broader accountability framework aiming to scrutinize underlying professional principles. Critical reflective practice is an approach that involves critically examining one’s own assumptions, biases, and actions in professional practice. It goes beyond simple reflection by delving into the underlying power dynamics, social contexts, and structural inequalities that shape professional interactions and outcomes. Critical reflective practitioners engage in a process of self-awareness, questioning dominant narratives, and challenging oppressive systems within their professional contexts. This approach encourages individuals to interrogate their own positions of privilege and power, recognize the perspectives and experiences of marginalized groups, and advocate for social justice and equity in their practice. Critical reflective practice is essential for fostering inclusive, culturally competent, and ethically responsible professional conduct across various fields, including social work, healthcare, education, and librarianship.

Applications specific to teaching and learning

Adapted from “Reflective Practice and Critical Reflection” by Jan Fook

University-Based Teaching Programs:

In academic settings, critical reflection can be integrated into courses to encourage students to critically analyze their own experiences, theories, and practices. It helps students develop a deeper understanding of course content and its real-world applications.

Continuing Education or Peer Supervision Programs:

For practitioners, ongoing professional development is crucial. Critical reflection sessions or peer supervision groups provide opportunities for practitioners to share experiences, receive feedback, and gain new insights into their practice. This fosters a culture of continuous learning and improvement.

Adaptation with Different Tools:

The flexibility of critical reflection allows it to be tailored to suit diverse learning preferences and contexts. Educators and practitioners can choose from various tools, such as case studies, journaling, or role-playing exercises, to facilitate reflection and dialogue.

Self-Critical Reflection:

Engaging in self-reflection enables individuals to examine their own thoughts, feelings, and actions. It encourages self-awareness, personal growth, and the development of metacognitive skills. Self-critical reflection can be particularly valuable for individuals seeking to deepen their understanding of their own practice.

One-to-One Supervision or Peer Learning Groups:

Supervisors and peers play essential roles in supporting reflective practice. Through one-to-one supervision or group discussions, individuals can explore complex issues, gain different perspectives, and receive constructive feedback. This collaborative approach enhances critical thinking and problem-solving skills.

Engagement with a Critical Friend:

Having a trusted colleague or mentor as a “critical friend” can provide invaluable support in the reflective process. Critical friends offer objective feedback, challenge assumptions, and help individuals identify blind spots or areas for improvement. This reciprocal relationship fosters mutual learning and professional growth.

Critical reflection, cultural humility, and trauma informed librarianship

Critical reflective practices can be highly beneficial for Library staff aiming to practice cultural humility and implement trauma-informed librarianship. Here’s how:

  • Self-awareness: Library staff can use critical reflection to become more aware of their own assumptions, biases, and attitudes towards patrons who have experienced trauma. Reflecting on personal beliefs and experiences can help staff identify any potential barriers to providing trauma-informed services.
  • Understanding trauma: Through critical reflection, library staff can deepen their understanding of trauma and its impact on individuals. This includes recognizing signs of trauma, understanding triggers, and empathizing with patrons who may be experiencing distress.
  • Assessment of current practices: Library staff can critically reflect on their current library practices and policies to assess their alignment with trauma-informed principles. This involves examining aspects such as signage, language used in communication, physical space layout, and staff interactions to ensure they are supportive and sensitive to trauma survivors.
  • Identifying gaps: Critical reflection enables staff to identify gaps in services or resources that may be hindering trauma-informed care. This could involve assessing the availability of relevant materials, training opportunities for staff, or the need for partnerships with community organizations specializing in trauma support.
  • Continuous improvement: By regularly engaging in critical reflection, staff can continually evaluate and improve their approach to trauma-informed librarianship. This includes soliciting feedback from patrons and colleagues, staying updated on best practices, and being open to making necessary adjustments.
  • Creating a supportive environment: Library staff can use critical reflection to cultivate a supportive and inclusive environment within the library. This involves fostering a culture of empathy, understanding, and respect among staff and patrons, where individuals feel safe to seek assistance without fear of judgment or re-traumatization.

Overall, critical reflective practices empower library staff to enhance their capacity to provide compassionate and effective services to patrons who have experienced trauma, thereby contributing to the creation of a more trauma-informed library environment.

Exercise 3: Critical reflective practices

From “Reflective Practice and Critical Reflection” by Jan Fook:

  • Reflective practice tradition questions include: What assumptions did I have? How do my beliefs about power relate to my values?
  • Reflexivity perspective questions involve: How did I influence the situation? What preconceptions did I have?
  • Postmodern/deconstructive perspective questions focus on: What language/words/patterns did I use? Have I used any binary opposites?
  • Critical stance questions emphasize: How has my thinking changed? Can I use my power differently?

While each perspective offers different ways of asking critical reflective questions, there is commonality among them. It’s important to use these theoretical underpinnings in an integrated and inclusive way to maximize the potential meaningfulness of critical reflection. There is no prescribed way to undertake critical reflection, and its diversity allows for maximum effectiveness in various situations.

Here are more critical reflection questions to get you started:

  • How did my presence make a difference?
  • What sort of power did I think I have, and how did I establish myself in the citation?
  • What were my beliefs about power and how did these affect what I did or chose to see?
  • Have I used any binary opposites, and what is the basis for these?
  • What perspectives are missing?
  • What are my constructions of power?
  • What is the relationship between my beliefs about power and the mainstream or dominant view?

Conclusion

As library staff you possess expert knowledge, skills, and access to resources. This gives you a position of esteem and influence, which can, in turn, create a distance between you and library users. Engaging with cultural humility and critical reflection in the library setting has the potential to significantly influence how individuals navigate power dynamics within the institution. Cultural humility prompts library staff to not only recognize but actively address the inherent power imbalances that exist within library spaces. By approaching interactions with humility, respect, and openness to learning from diverse perspectives, staff can create a more inclusive and welcoming environment for patrons from various cultural backgrounds. By taking into account the power, privilege, and history of your background and profession, you can better consider the effects they play on your practice, interactions, and the individuals you work with.

Critical reflective practices also empowers library staff to delve deeper into the ways in which power operates within library systems and structures. Through ongoing self-reflection and critical analysis, staff can identify and challenge entrenched power dynamics that may perpetuate inequities or marginalize certain groups of patrons. This includes interrogating institutional policies, practices, and collections to ensure they are inclusive and responsive to the needs of all community members.

By integrating cultural humility and critical reflective practices into their professional toolkit, staff can actively work to dismantle barriers to access and participation within the library. They can advocate for representation and diversity in library resources and services, amplify marginalized voices and perspectives, and cultivate a culture of respect, empathy, and inclusivity among staff and patrons alike.

Reflection questions, for now and for later:

  • How have your upbringing and past experiences shaped your decision-making process? In what ways can libraries integrate elements from your upbringing into their design?
  • How can you contribute to fostering successful interdependence in the workplace?
  • How does the historical context of your library’s location influence your workplace environment?
  • What measures are taken in your workplace to address power imbalances?
  • What reflective strategies can you employ to cultivate cultural humility?
  • What identities and roles do you inhabit, and how do they contribute to power dynamics in the workplace?
  • What is your role in challenging structural inequities and fostering cultural humility?
  • How do my own cultural background and experiences influence my interactions with library patrons and colleagues?
  • Am I open to learning about and understanding cultures and perspectives different from my own? How do I demonstrate this?
  • How do I respond when faced with cultural differences or misunderstandings in the library?
  • What biases or assumptions might I hold about certain cultural groups, and how do these impact my work?
  • In what ways can I create a welcoming and inclusive environment for patrons and colleagues of all cultural backgrounds?
  • Do I actively listen to the perspectives and experiences of marginalized communities within the library? How is this demonstrated in my work?
  • How can I incorporate cultural humility into my daily interactions and decision-making processes?
  • What steps can I take to continually educate myself and challenge my own beliefs and attitudes?
  • How can I promote cultural humility within the library without putting more labor and relying on colleagues from different cultures to educate me?

 


  1. Bossaller, Jenny, Denice Adkins, and Kim M Thompson. n.d. “Critical Theory, Libraries and Culture.”
  2. Seiden, Peggy, and E Mitchell. n.d. “Navigating Institutional Culture: Building Bridges And Not Burning Them.”
  3. Shackleton, Ross T., Gretchen Walters, Jevgeniy Bluwstein, Houria Djoudi, Livia Fritz, Flore Lafaye de Micheaux, Tristan Loloum, et al. 2023. “Navigating Power in Conservation.” Conservation Science and Practice 5 (3): e12877. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12877.
  4. Maryland Institute, College of Art, and Jennifer Ferretti. 2020. “Building a Critical Culture: How Critical Librarianship Falls Short in the Workplace.” Communications in Information Literacy 14 (1). https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2020.14.1.10.
  5. University of Pittsburgh, and Marcia Rapchak. 2021. “Introducing Critical Librarianship to Information Professionals: Using Critical Pedagogy and Critical Information Literacy in an LIS Graduate Course.” Communications in Information Literacy 15 (1). https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2021.15.1.8.
  6. Bossaller, Jenny, Denice Adkins, and Kim M Thompson. n.d.
  7. Seiden, Peggy, and E Mitchell. n.d.
  8. Shackleton, Ross T., Gretchen Walters, Jevgeniy Bluwstein, Houria Djoudi, Livia Fritz, Flore Lafaye de Micheaux, Tristan Loloum, et al. 2023.
  9. University of Pittsburgh, and Marcia Rapchak. 2021.
  10. 1. Sara Ahmed, “A Phenomenology of Whiteness,” Fanon, Phenomenology, and Psychology, September 10, 2021, 229–46, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037132-22.
  11. Beilin, Ian G. 2018. “Critical Librarianship as an Academic Pursuit,” 195–210. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8698KKP.
  12. Bossaller, Jenny, Denice Adkins, and Kim M Thompson. n.d.
  13. Seiden, Peggy, and E Mitchell. n.d.
  14. Shackleton, Ross T., Gretchen Walters, Jevgeniy Bluwstein, Houria Djoudi, Livia Fritz, Flore Lafaye de Micheaux, Tristan Loloum, et al. 2023.
  15. 1. Sarah R. Kostelecky, Lori Townsend, and David A. Hurley, Hopeful Visions, Practical Actions: Cultural Humility in Library Work (London: Facet, 2023).
  16. Fook, Jan. n.d. “REFLECTIVE PRACTICE AND CRITICAL REFLECTION.”

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Trauma Informed Librarianship Copyright © by Kimberlie Sullivan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.