"

Building resilience

Understanding the brain in survival mode

 

The human brain operates in two primary modes: the learning brain and the survival brain. These modes influence how individuals perceive and respond to their environment. Stress, trauma, and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) can impact individuals’ behavior and well-being by shifting the brain into survival mode. Stress can make simple tasks feel overwhelming, which reflects the transition from the learning brain to the survival brain. Understanding these modes and their triggers is crucial for navigating optimal well-being.[1][2]

The learning brain refers to the part of the brain that is engaged when individuals are in a state of calm and safety and encompasses regions of the brain responsible for higher-order cognitive functions such as reasoning, problem-solving, decision-making, impulse control, plan for the future, and regulate their emotions effectively. This mode of operation fosters learning, growth, and adaptation to new experiences.When the learning brain is activated, individuals can think more clearly and access their cognitive abilities effectively. This mindset is characterized by openness to new concepts and eagerness for personal growth and development. In the learning brain mode, individuals can absorb new information.[3][4][5][6][7]

In contrast, the survival brain, also referred to as the primitive brain or the reptilian brain, governs instinctual responses to perceived threats and dangers and emerges when individuals feel overwhelmed mentally or emotionally, hindering their ability to process new information. The amygdala and the hypothalamus are activated, triggering the release of stress hormones, like cortisol and adrenaline. This mode of operation prioritizes rapid, automatic responses to threats, bypassing higher cognitive functions in favor of instinctual reactions. In this state, individuals may have difficulty thinking logically or accessing higher-level cognitive functions. Instead, their focus shifts to immediate survival instincts; it signifies that the brain is prioritizing immediate survival needs over cognitive tasks. This mode is focused on ensuring one’s survival amidst challenging circumstances.[8][9][10][11]

Causes of Survival Brain

Trauma, stress, and ACEs can profoundly impact the brain's functioning, often causing it to enter survival mode. When individuals experience trauma or chronic stress, particularly during critical periods of brain development in childhood, it can dysregulate the brain's stress response systems and sensitize the survival brain. Marginalized groups of people often find themselves disproportionately affected by trauma and stress due to systemic inequalities and discrimination embedded within society, such as racism, sexism, ableism, and homophobia.[12][13][14][15][16][17]

These individuals can face additional obstacles, including economic hardship, social exclusion, and institutionalized oppression, which can perpetuate cycles of trauma and adversity.[18] The pervasive nature of systemic injustices, inflicts profound psychological and emotional wounds, exacerbating stress and hindering individuals' ability to thrive.[19][20][21][22][23]

A brain that has experienced trauma becomes hypersensitive to potential threats, leading to exaggerated fear responses and heightened arousal levels even in non-threatening situations.[24][25][26] Additionally, ACEs can disrupt the development of the learning brain, impairing cognitive functioning and emotional regulation skills.[27][28] As a result, individuals who have experienced trauma or ACEs may frequently find themselves operating in survival mode, even in the absence of immediate threats. In this state, they may exhibit a range of behaviors aimed at self-preservation, such as hypervigilance, avoidance, emotional dysregulation, and impulsivity. These behaviors serve as adaptive responses to past experiences of trauma or adversity but can interfere with daily functioning and relationships.[29] Overall, understanding the interplay between the learning brain and the survival brain sheds light on how trauma and stress shape individuals' neurological responses and behaviors. By recognizing the signs of survival mode activation and providing trauma-informed support and interventions, individuals and organizations can help promote healing, resilience, and well-being in those affected by trauma and ACEs.[30]

Understanding the interplay between the learning brain and survival brain is essential in trauma-informed practice, and recognizing the intersectionality of trauma and oppression is essential in addressing the unique needs of marginalized communities and fostering inclusive environments that prioritize healing and resilience. By creating environments that promote a sense of safety and calm, individuals can shift from survival mode to learning mode, enabling them to engage more effectively with learning, problem-solving, and personal growth.

How is this relevant to librarianship?

In the context of librarianship, understanding the dynamics between the learning brain and survival brain is crucial for providing effective support and resources to library users. Academic environments can be inherently stressful, with students facing pressures related to academic performance, deadlines, and personal challenges. When stress levels rise, students may struggle to engage with learning materials, access information effectively, or seek help from library staff.

Recognizing the signs of survival brain activation in library users can guide librarians in providing empathetic and responsive support. For instance, if a student appears visibly distressed or struggles to articulate their needs, it may indicate that they are operating in survival mode, prioritizing immediate survival instincts over cognitive tasks. In such situations, librarians can adopt trauma-informed approaches to create safe and supportive spaces where individuals feel understood and validated.

Understanding the underlying causes of survival brain activation, such as chronic stress or trauma, can also inform the development of library programs and services aimed at promoting mental health and well-being. Academic libraries can offer resources on stress management, relaxation techniques, and mental health awareness to empower students to navigate challenges effectively and build resilience.

By fostering environments that prioritize safety, calmness, and inclusivity, academic libraries can help individuals transition from survival mode to learning mode, enabling them to engage more effectively with educational resources and pursue their academic goals. In doing so, librarians play a pivotal role in supporting the holistic well-being and academic success of their communities.

Understanding the learning brain and survival brain dynamics is fundamental to trauma-informed librarianship as it enables libraries to recognize the signs of survival brain activation in patrons and provide a safe space for them to navigate challenges and build resilience. By identifying when individuals are operating in survival mode—prioritizing immediate survival instincts over cognitive tasks—librarians can offer empathetic and responsive support tailored to patrons' needs. Creating environments that prioritize safety, calmness, and inclusivity allows patrons to feel understood and validated, fostering a sense of security necessary for healing and growth. Through this understanding, libraries can play a crucial role in helping patrons transition from survival mode to learning mode, empowering them to engage effectively with resources and services and ultimately build resilience in the face of adversity.

Reflection questions, for now and for later:

  • How might understanding the concepts of a learning brain versus a trauma brain influence library practices?
  • How do you think trauma affects patrons' ability to engage with library resources and services? How can librarians adjust their approaches to accommodate patrons who may be struggling with trauma-related challenges?
  • Have you observed instances where library users seem overwhelmed or distressed when seeking assistance or engaging with resources? How did you respond, and what strategies did you employ to support them?
  • Reflect on your interactions with library users during times of heightened stress or pressure, such as exam periods or major deadlines. How do you adapt your approach to accommodate their needs and promote a sense of safety and support?
  • Consider the signs that may indicate a library user is operating in survival mode, prioritizing immediate survival instincts over cognitive tasks. How can you recognize these signs, and what steps can you take to create a safe and supportive environment for individuals experiencing heightened stress or trauma?
  • Reflect on the role of academic libraries in promoting mental health and well-being among students and faculty. How can libraries contribute to stress reduction, resilience-building, and the creation of inclusive spaces that prioritize safety and calmness?
  • Explore opportunities to incorporate trauma-informed approaches into your interactions with library users and the development of library programs and services. How can you ensure that your library practices align with principles of empathy, understanding, and inclusivity?
  • Consider the broader societal factors that contribute to stress and trauma among library users, such as systemic inequalities and discrimination. How can libraries address these underlying issues and advocate for social justice and equity within their communities?
  • Reflect on your own experiences of stress and trauma in the library profession. How do you prioritize self-care and well-being amidst the demands of your role, and what support systems do you rely on for assistance?
  • Explore opportunities for professional development and training in trauma-informed practice within the library profession. How can you enhance your knowledge and skills in supporting individuals affected by trauma, and what resources are available to assist you in this journey?
  • Consider the long-term impact of trauma-informed approaches on library users' engagement with resources, academic success, and overall well-being. How can libraries measure the effectiveness of these approaches and continuously improve their services to better meet the needs of their communities?
  • Reflect on the transformative potential of libraries as spaces of healing, resilience, and empowerment for individuals affected by stress and trauma. How can you contribute to creating a library environment that fosters growth, learning, and holistic well-being for all members of your community?

Building resilience through trauma informed practices

It is known that ACEs can lead to poor adult health.[31] While ACEs can be traumatic and can have negative effects on an individual, people who have experienced ACEs or other forms of trauma can still live healthy and fulfilling lives.[32][33][34] Studies have found that we can mitigate the negative effects of ACEs by promoting and building resilience.[35][36][37] When confronted with adversity, resilience emerges as a pivotal factor mitigating the impact of trauma.[38][39] Resilience, a multifaceted construct, encompasses an array of individual attributes and systemic resources that serve as protective mechanisms.[40] Widely defined as "a dynamic process encompassing positive adaptation within the context of significant adversity"[41], resilience functions both as a promotive and protective factor, facilitating individuals' ability to navigate and rebound from stressful life events[42]

In higher education, there has been a surge in professional development opportunities for faculty and staff focused on fostering and enhancing student resilience, highlighting the growing significance and recognition of resilience training in academia. While initially appearing benign and possibly advantageous, these discussions pose challenges or risks for individuals already navigating expectations incongruent with their reality and those facing systemic oppression and marginalization, emphasizing and reinforcing the individual- deficit model of disability, "where those who struggle in some way are seen as problematic for not being adequately resilient."[43] Resilience discourse aims to mitigate distress and disability across populations but inadvertently establishes a harmful ideal centered on celebrating individual adversity. These discourses not only perpetuate notions of difference, disability, and distress as obstacles to overcome but also hinder efforts towards inclusion and accessibility. Rather than placing the burden of change on individuals, addressing systemic inequities requires comprehensive systemic change.[44][45]

Trauma-informed practices are instrumental in fostering resilience in individuals and communities without upholding this ableist approach[46][47][48][49][50] Resilience, in essence, is the ability to bounce back from adversity and thrive despite challenging circumstances. By recognizing the profound impact of trauma on individuals' lives and behaviors, trauma-informed approaches provide a supportive framework for promoting resilience without putting additional blame, pressure, or inadequacy on the individual. These practices prioritize safety, trust, and empowerment, creating environments where patrons feel validated and understood. Libraries, at their best, can act as spaces that often serve as community hubs and can even play a crucial role in promoting resilience among patrons. Through trauma-informed interventions, such as providing access to relevant resources, offering supportive programming, and facilitating connections with community support services, libraries can help individuals develop coping skills, establish supportive relationships, and regain a sense of control over their lives. By fostering a sense of agency and promoting positive coping mechanisms, libraries contribute to the cultivation of resilience among their patrons. Additionally, trauma-informed approaches underscore the importance of addressing systemic barriers and promoting social connectedness, further enhancing individuals' ability to overcome trauma and thrive. Ultimately, by integrating trauma-informed principles into their services and programs, libraries empower individuals to navigate adversity, cultivate resilience, and lead fulfilling lives.

Reflection questions, for now and for later:

  • How might a deeper understanding of trauma-informed approaches enhance the overall library experience for patrons?
  • How might libraries balance the need for providing access to information with ensuring the emotional well-being of patrons and staff affected by trauma?
  • How can I create a safe and welcoming environment using a trauma informed approach in the library that fosters trust and empowerment for all patrons?
  • Are there any policies or procedures in place that may inadvertently re-traumatize patrons, and how can they be modified to better align with trauma-informed principles?
  • How do I recognize signs of trauma in library users, and what steps can I take to respond sensitively and supportively?
  • What resources, training, or support do I need to enhance my understanding of trauma and trauma-informed care, and how can I access them?
  • How can I collaborate with colleagues, community organizations, and trauma survivors to strengthen trauma-informed practices in the library?
  • What successes or challenges have I encountered in implementing trauma-informed approaches, and what lessons can I learn from these experiences?

 


  1. Nissim-Matheis, Liz. 2020. “The Learning Brain V. The Survival Brain: How Social Emotional Wellbeing Impacts Executive Functioning Skills.” Psychological and Educational Consulting (blog). September 28, 2020. https://www.psychedconsult.com/the-learning-brain-v-the-survival-brain-how-social-emotional-wellbeing-impacts-executive-functioning-skills/.
  2. “BRRNWGA - Learning vs. Survival.” n.d. Accessed May 4, 2024. https://www.resilientnwga.org/learning-journey/trauma-101/learning-vs-survival.
  3. Dubinsky, Janet M., Gillian Roehrig, and Sashank Varma. 2022. “A Place for Neuroscience in Teacher Knowledge and Education.” Mind, Brain, and Education 16 (4): 267–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12334.
  4. Dubinsky, Janet M., S. Selcen Guzey, Marc S. Schwartz, Gillian Roehrig, Carrie MacNabb, Astrid Schmied, Vicki Hinesley, et al. 2019. “Contributions of Neuroscience Knowledge to Teachers and Their Practice.” The Neuroscientist: A Review Journal Bringing Neurobiology, Neurology and Psychiatry 25 (5): 394–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858419835447.
  5. Goldberg, Hagar. 2022. “Growing Brains, Nurturing Minds—Neuroscience as an Educational Tool to Support Students’ Development as Life-Long Learners.” Brain Sciences 12 (12): 1622. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12121622.
  6. Imad, Mays. 2023. “From Deficit to Empowerment: A Neuroscience Approach to Unveiling the Learning Brain.” The Teaching Professor (blog). September 11, 2023. https://www.teachingprofessor.com/free-article/from-defecit-to-empowerment-a-neuroscience-approach-to-unveiling-the-learning-brain/.
  7. Privitera, Adam John. 2021. “A Scoping Review of Research on Neuroscience Training for Teachers.” Trends in Neuroscience and Education 24 (September): 100157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2021.100157.
  8. Ching, Fiona N. Y., Winnie W. M. So, Sing Kai Lo, and Savio W. H. Wong. 2020. “Preservice Teachers’ Neuroscience Literacy and Perceptions of Neuroscience in Education: Implications for Teacher Education.” Trends in Neuroscience and Education 21 (December): 100144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2020.100144.
  9. Dubinsky, Janet M., Gillian Roehrig, and Sashank Varma. 2022.[footnote][footnote]Dubinsky, Janet M., S. Selcen Guzey, Marc S. Schwartz, Gillian Roehrig, Carrie MacNabb, Astrid Schmied, Vicki Hinesley, et al. 2019.
  10. Goldberg, Hagar. 2022.
  11. Privitera, Adam John. 2021.
  12. Polaris. n.d. "The Victims." National Human Trafficking Hotline. https://humantraffickinghotline.org/what-human-trafficking/human-trafficking/victims.
  13. Proctor, Bernadette D., Jessica L. Semega, and Melissa A. Kollar. 2016. "Income and Poverty in the United States: 2015." US Census Bureau. https://www-census-gov.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2016/demo/p60-256.pdf.
  14. Roberts, A. L., S. E. Gilman, J. Breslau, N. Breslau, and K. C. Koenen. 2011. “Race/Ethnic Differences in Exposure to Traumatic Events, Development of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, and Treatment-Seeking for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in the United States.” Psychological Medicine 41 (1): 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291710000401.
  15. Seng, Julia S., William D. Lopez, Mickey Sperlich, Lydia Hamama, and Caroline D. Reed Meldrum. 2012. “Marginalized Identities, Discrimination Burden, and Mental Health: Empirical Exploration of an Interpersonal-Level Approach to Modeling Intersectionality.” Social Science & Medicine (1982) 75 (12): 2437–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.023.
  16. Eiser, Arnold R., and Glenn Ellis. 2007. “Viewpoint: Cultural Competence and the African American Experience with Health Care: The Case for Specific Content in Cross-Cultural Education.” Academic Medicine 82 (2): 176. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31802d92ea.
  17. “College Sexual Assault and Campus Climate for Sexual- and Gender-Minority Undergraduate Students - Robert W. S. Coulter, Susan R. Rankin, 2020.” n.d. Accessed May 4, 2024. https://journals-sagepub-com.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/doi/10.1177/0886260517696870.
  18. Proctor, Bernadette D., Jessica L. Semega, and Melissa A. Kollar. 2016.
  19. “Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs).” 2023. September 5, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/aces/index.html.
  20. Gómez, Jennifer M., Robyn L. Gobin, and Melissa L. Barnes. 2021. “Discrimination, Violence, & Healing within Marginalized Communities.” Journal of Trauma & Dissociation : The Official Journal of the International Society for the Study of Dissociation (ISSD) 22 (2): 135. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2021.1869059.
  21. Matheson, Kimberly, Mindi D. Foster, Amy Bombay, Robyn J. McQuaid, and Hymie Anisman. 2019. “Traumatic Experiences, Perceived Discrimination, and Psychological Distress Among Members of Various Socially Marginalized Groups.” Frontiers in Psychology 10 (February): 416. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00416.
  22. “Toxic Stress.” n.d. Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. Accessed May 3, 2024. https://developingchild.harvard.edu/science/key-concepts/toxic-stress/.
  23. “What Are ACEs? And How Do They Relate to Toxic Stress?” n.d. Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. Accessed May 3, 2024. https://developingchild.harvard.edu/resources/aces-and-toxic-stress-frequently-asked-questions/.
  24. Grossman, Samara, Zara Cooper, Heather Buxton, Sarah Hendrickson, Annie Lewis-O’Connor, Jane Stevens, Lye-Yeng Wong, and Stephanie Bonne. 2021. “Trauma-Informed Care: Recognizing and Resisting Re-Traumatization in Health Care.” Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open 6 (1): e000815. https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2021-000815.
  25. Kearney, Breanne E., and Ruth A. Lanius. 2022. “The Brain-Body Disconnect: A Somatic Sensory Basis for Trauma-Related Disorders.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1015749.
  26. Liberzon, Israel, and James L. Abelson. 2016. “Context Processing and the Neurobiology of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.” Neuron 92 (1): 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.09.039.
  27. “Adverse Childhood Experiences - an Overview | ScienceDirect Topics.” n.d. Accessed May 4, 2024. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/adverse-childhood-experiences.
  28. Herzog, Julia I., and Christian Schmahl. 2018. “Adverse Childhood Experiences and the Consequences on Neurobiological, Psychosocial, and Somatic Conditions Across the Lifespan.” Frontiers in Psychiatry 9 (September): 420. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00420.
  29. Treatment (US), Center for Substance Abuse. 2014. “Understanding the Impact of Trauma.” In Trauma-Informed Care in Behavioral Health Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK207191/.
  30. Sheffler, Julia L., Jennifer R. Piazza, Jamie M. Quinn, Natalie J. Sachs-Ericsson, and Ian H. Stanley. 2019. “Adverse Childhood Experiences and Coping Strategies: Identifying Pathways to Resiliency in Adulthood.” Anxiety, Stress, and Coping 32 (5): 594–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2019.1638699.
  31. Levine, Saul. 2003. “Psychological and Social Aspects of Resilience: A Synthesis of Risks and Resources.” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 5 (3): 273–80.
  32. Nugent, Nicole R., Jennifer A. Sumner, and Ananda B. Amstadter. 2014. “Resilience after Trauma: From Surviving to Thriving.” European Journal of Psychotraumatology 5 (October): 10.3402/ejpt.v5.25339. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.25339.
  33. Elaine Miller-Karas, Building Resilience to Trauma: The Trauma and Community Resiliency Models (Milton: Taylor & Francis Group, 2023).
  34. Levine, Saul. 2003. “Psychological and Social Aspects of Resilience: A Synthesis of Risks and Resources.” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 5 (3): 273–80.
  35. Boullier, Mary, and Mitch Blair. 2018. “Adverse Childhood Experiences.” Paediatrics and Child Health 28 (3): 132–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paed.2017.12.008.
  36. Watters, Elizabeth R., Kayla Reed-Fitzke, and Armeda Stevenson Wojciak. 2024. “Attachment, Regulation, and Competency in Emerging Adults: Validating a Framework of Resilience in a Population with Adverse Childhood Experiences.” Children and Youth Services Review 159 (April): 107530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107530.
  37. Khrapatina, Irina, and Pearl Berman. 2017. “The Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Health in College Students.” Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma 10 (3): 275–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-016-0093-0.
  38. Mohammedhamid Osman Kelifa et al., “How Adverse Childhood Experiences Relate to Subjective Wellbeing in College Students: The Role of Resilience and Depression,” Journal of Happiness Studies 22, no. 5 (September 7, 2020): 2103–23, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00308-7.
  39. Leung, Doris Y. L., Athena C. Y. Chan, and Grace W. K. Ho. 2022. “Resilience of Emerging Adults After Adverse Childhood Experiences: A Qualitative Systematic Review.” Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 23 (1): 163–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020933865.
  40. Masten, Ann S. 2001. “Ordinary Magic: Resilience Processes in Development.” American Psychologist 56 (3): 227–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227.
  41. Luthar, Suniya S., Dante Cicchetti, and Bronwyn Becker. 2000. “The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work.” Child Development 71 (3): 543–62.
  42. Masten, Ann S., and W. John Curtis. 2000. “Integrating Competence and Psychopathology: Pathways toward a Comprehensive Science of Adaptation in Development.” Development and Psychopathology 12 (3): 529–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095457940000314X.
  43. Moeller, Christine M. 2019. “Disability, Identity, and Professionalism: Precarity in Librarianship.” Library Trends 67 (3): 455–70.
  44. Aubrecht, Katie. 2012. “The New Vocabulary of Resilience and the Governance of University Student Life.” Studies in Social Justice 6 (1): 67–83. https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v6i1.1069.
  45. Simard-Gagnon, Laurence. 2016. “Everyone Is Fed, Bathed, Asleep, and I Have Made It through Another Day: Problematizing Accommodation, Resilience, and Care in the Neoliberal Academy.” Canadian Geographies / Géographies Canadiennes 60 (2): 219–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12274.
  46. “Building Resilience Through Trauma-Informed Care.” 2020. NAMI Dane County. June 16, 2020. https://www.namidanecounty.org/blog/2020/6/15/building-resilience-through-trauma-informed-care.
  47. Leitch, Laurie. 2017. “Action Steps Using ACEs and Trauma-Informed Care: A Resilience Model.” Health & Justice 5 (1): 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-017-0050-5.
  48. “Trauma-Informed, Resilience-Oriented, Equity-Focused Systems.” n.d. National Council for Mental Wellbeing. Accessed May 3, 2024. https://www.thenationalcouncil.org/service/trauma-informed-resilience-oriented-equity-focused-systems/.
  49. Wall, Carrie R. Giboney. 2021. “Relationship over Reproach: Fostering Resilience by Embracing a Trauma-Informed Approach to Elementary Education.” Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 30 (1): 118–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2020.1737292.
  50. King, Lindsey M., Gaia Zori, Sarah L. Collins, Carol Lewis, George Hack, Brittney N. Dixon, and Mark Hart. 2022. “What Does Community Resilience Mean in the Context of Trauma-Informed Communities? A Scoping Review.” Journal of Community Psychology 50 (8): 3325–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22839.

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Trauma Informed Librarianship Copyright © by Kimberlie Sullivan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.